Posts tagged as:

Reinventing Advertising

6 Ways to Make a Good Company More Fascinating

by Sally Hogshead on March 16, 2010

Originally featured as a Guest Author Blog on CNBC.com

Fascinating companies, like fascinating people, get under our skin and into our conversations. They challenge us and move us. They’re unafraid to ask questions, and incite a response. They incite strong reactions from a specific audience. Yet in an attempt to be all things to all people, most brands end up being nothing to anyone. (If you’re not generating a negative reaction from someone, you’re probably not influencing anyone.)

In FASCINATE, I describe why consumers become fascinated by certain brands, but not others. To expand your company’s influence, you can tap into seven universal deeply-rooted “triggers” of influence: power, lust, mystique, prestige, alarm, vice, and trust. By applying these seven fascination triggers, you can make any product or idea (even ordinary ones!) more persuasive.

Is your brand fascinating? There’s not a one-size-fits-all answer, but there are specific criteria. And you can apply these criteria to evaluate any type of message: from a product launch or packaging concept, to a PowerPoint presentation or political statement.

How to evaluate your brand? Start by checking it against the six Gold Hallmarks of a Fascinating Brand.

Gold Hallmark #1: Provokes Strong and Immediate Emotional Reactions

People respond to the brand immediately, almost involuntarily. The advertising might stimulate a “love it or hate it” response. For example: Fox News. Disney. Acid rap. Trader Joe’s. NASCAR.

Ask your team:

  • Do we provoke strong and immediate emotional reactions?
  • Are we watering our messages down to mush (through committees, or safe thinking, or fear)?

Gold Hallmark #2: Creates Advocates

Regular consumers become passionate advocates when your brand effectively activates one or more fascination triggers. These dedicated fans may be a small slice of your overall base, but they’re the most active and vocal, and they’ll exponentially increase your marketing efforts. Reward them, inspire them, and support their communication with you, and with one another. Examples: Louis Vuitton. Harley Davidson. The Twilight Series of books and movies.

Ask your team:

  • What would it take to make someone want to pay for a T-shirt bearing our logo? What would it take for people to be willing to stand in line for hours to purchase our product?
  • What would it take for our product to become so beloved that it never, ever went on sale?

Gold Hallmark #3: Becomes “Cultural Shorthand” for a Specific Set of Actions or Values

The brand represents such a distinct point of view that it can stand alone as a symbol for a defined set of values; it becomes a reference point for how people identify themselves, and their world. These companies earn attention by focusing on a specific set of values: Home Depot (do-it-yourself), Patagonia (sustainability), Target (accessible style), Ikea (democratic design), or De Beers (romantic expression).

Ask your team:

  • Do we embody a specific set of values, or actions?
  • How could we turn our unique attributes into emblems of our beliefs?

Pret A Manger, a gourmet take-out chain, evokes the lust trigger through tiny details. Each location of this chain stirs its granola by hand, using a four foot-long wooden oar. Sure, the company could far more easily stir it with a mechanical mixer, but, they insist, this would damage the oats’ flavor and texture. With this one tiny detail the brand stirs our imagination.

Gold Hallmark #4: Incites conversation

The more people want to engage with, play with, learn from, talk about, and, above all, connect with something or someone, the greater its influence. Influential brands spark spirited conversations and debate among consumers, competition, and the media. Examples: NFL Fantasy Football. Adidas original. PBS. TMZ.com.

Ask your team:

  • Are we inciting conversations?
  • What opportunities do you create for people to connect with one another?
  • Does your message create debate? (No? Your point of view might not be distinct or vibrant enough.)

The U.S. military employed this tactic.

When the number of recruits dropped, the military started conversations among potential recruits by creating a video game. Named “Future Force Company Commander,” or F2C2, portrays the nation’s futuristic military as an invulnerable high-tech organization, giving its consumers (teenage boys) a carefully controlled glimpse of battle. Even if you don’t agree with the use of F2C2, you can’t ignore how this outreach effort got so many potential recruits talking, and connecting, around the brand.

Gold Hallmark #5: Forces competitors to realign around it

These companies don’t chase or mirror trends, but rather, establish new standards for the category. They think, act, and behave unlike any other. Often, they inspire imitators, look-alikes, and me-toos. Examples: Trader Joe’s. Axe Body Spray. Wal-Mart. Swiffer. Microsoft, then Apple, then Microsoft again.

Ask your team:

  • How could you communicate so distinctively that your innovations turn into your consumers’ expectations?
  • How could you become irreplaceable for the audience, impossible to exactly replace or duplicate?
  • Could people describe themselves by comparing you to your competition (“Are you a Mac, or a PC?”)

Gold Hallmark #6: Taps Into (or Even Causes) Social Revolutions

When people become fascinated, they merge with larger groups of people fascinated by the same message. These groups dramatically accelerate your marketing, inciting others to join a bigger cultural movement.

Social revolutions aren’t once-in-a-decade events. They’re happening constantly, every single day, when we shift our decision-making. Zappos.com changed online shopping. Red Bull changed cocktail culture. Dove changed the conversation around female body image. Netflix changed media consumption. Viagra changed the perception of impotence to “erectile dysfunction.” Even if you don’t trigger social revolutions, you can make your budget go farther by tapping into cultural changes.

Ask your team:

  • How can our message take advantage of emerging changes in behavior?
  • What groups, communities, and tribes could our message excite and activate, so that they champion our message as part of their own?
  • Could we tie our message into what people are already doing and saying around a specific cause or effort?

This measure of fascination lives not in your own communication to the world, but in how the world communicates about you. For instance, on your Web site—it’s not about the number of links in your site, but about how many sites, and the quality of the sites, that link to you. On Facebook, the status updates that last in the news feed are the ones that generate the most commentary. On Twitter, it’s just not about what you say, but how many followers re-tweet your message to their followers.

Fascination has little to do with what you say, and everything to do with what you inspire others to say and do (and buy).

The Wizard of Oz said, “A heart is not judged by how much you love, but by how much you are loved by others.” The same is now true for brands. Marketing is no longer about creating messages—it’s about getting the market to participate, and to create fascinating messages about you and with you.

As much as we’d like to believe otherwise, the truth is, consumers don’t want to connect with brands. They want to connect with each other. Fascinating companies create more opportunities for people to connect with each other, through the brand.

Why do certain messages captivate, while seemingly equally deserving ones never get adoration (or even recognition)? Most marketers aspire to create messages that offend the fewest people. They’re playing not to lose. By evaluating our communication according to these six Gold Hallmarks, we can begin to make any type of message more fascinating: a sales presentation, a book, or anything else that must influence behavior in order to succeed.

In a competitive environment, the most fascinating option wins. Fascinating brands win more consumers, more PR, bigger budgets, more time, better talent, greater admiration, deeper trust. Brands that fail to fascinate will, increasingly, lose the battle.

It’s that simple.

The Talented Asshole vs. the Sweetheart Hack

by Sally Hogshead on February 22, 2010

“I believe you do not have to be an asshole, or work for one, in order to do great work.”

I posted this on Facebook last Saturday night at 8:27 p.m. Apparently, I’m not the only one who dislikes assholes. Almost immediately, folks ranging from CEOs and professors to newbies and retired stars were joining in to criticize obnoxious leaders. No one, it seems, enjoys working for nasty people.

This includes Donna Lee Jahn Merz, the soft-spoken reverend who baptized my children as newborns, who posted, “I am so totally over working for or with assholes. … What ever happened to ‘do unto others?’” (Hey, if she can drop the A-bomb on Facebook, so can I.) Comments about mean or egomaniacal bosses, both past and present, ranted on.

So it’s unanimous: No one wants to work for a jerk, under any circumstances. Nastiness is never tolerable. That’s settled. Right? Well, hold on. Not so fast. After getting such emphatic responses, I asked a question on Facebook:

“Would you rather work for a talented asshole, or a sweetheart hack?” And this, my friends, is where it started getting interesting. Of the dozens of ensuing comments, the response was startlingly clear: When forced to choose, the talented asshole wins. Nothing, it seems, is worse than working for a hack — even a sweet one.

Why? Comments ranged from “respect” and “better opportunity to grow,” “higher quality of work,” but the main sentiment was the one expressed by freelancer Robert Manley: “Talent trumps nice.”

Helayne Spivak, exec VP-chief creative officer of Saatchi & Saatchi Wellness, pointed out, “Sweetheart hacks? I don’t want to sound heartless, but … can we afford nice people who aren’t good at their jobs? How’s this: We pair every talented asshole with a sweetheart hack who just walks around all day apologizing for the asshole’s behavior. Problem solved.”

What’s so bad about being a sweetheart hack? Most cited either weak leadership, or inability to create and support great ideas. Sam Harrison, speaker and author of “IdeaSelling,” remarked, “Looking back on my career, I’ve loved the pats on the back. But I’ve grown most from the people who were willing to look me in the eye and say, ‘You’re a good person, but your work needs work.’” Bart Cleveland, creative director of McKee Wallwork Cleveland, weighed in: “Both are equally dangerous and helpful to one’s career. … You may learn something from the jerk. A sweetheart always erodes potential.”

This need to learn from genuine talent became a recurring theme, especially when I asked the question on Twitter. Copywriter Jenn Totten tweeted, “As a young person in the biz I’d rather work for a talented asshole than a hack … but if you’re a talented sweetheart, I’ll work even harder.” Anthony Kalamut, professor and program chair of creative advertising at Seneca College in Toronto, asserted that the “biggest killer of young fresh talent is ‘the sweetheart hack.’” Deborah Morrison, a professor of advertising at University of Oregon, wrote, “Transparency is a beautiful thing. … There’s probably a blog and Twitter feed on ‘here’s an asshole’ updates.” Hacks, the group surmised, are not only untalented, but also insecure.

The most dreaded combination, it seems, are the leaders who are both hacks and assholes. Nasty behavior can become part of the culture in some marketing departments and ad agencies, as mercurial behavior seems to get confused with genius.

If we can all agree that nasty leaders are bad, then why do they so frequently seem to rise into management positions? In this environment, a less forceful personality can unfortunately be perceived as less charismatic, or even weak. Kathy Hepinstall, former creative director at TBWA Chiat Day, wrote, “The sad fact is, assholes break through. They’re colorful. They are spoken of. Like sound over water, assholism travels far.”

Do some bosses unfairly earn this reputation? Talented leaders must make tough choices, fight for innovative ideas, advocate for their team, and refuse to settle for average. They’re unafraid to ask questions, and don’t pander to the committee. They push everyone around them to work harder and go outside the comfort zone, and along the way, they’ll occasionally step on toes. (Do you think Apple’s Steve Jobs is a sweetheart?)

In my book, “Fascinate,” I delve into research on how influence develops and expands. Persuasive leaders, like persuasive brands, tap into specific “fascination triggers.” Intentionally or not, they elicit certain patterns of response every time they communicate.

The most dominant or polarizing brands — a.k.a. the talented assholes — tend to overuse certain traits. They gorge on the power, alarm and vice triggers, taking these traits to an extreme. Sweetheart hacks, on the other hand, become so hyper-reliant on the consistency of the trust trigger that their creativity and passion takes a back seat.

As a result, the asshole/hack debate is highly subjective. What appears to be brilliant leadership to some people might feel like power-mongering or ego-run-amok to others.

True talents can do great work and support others. Cathy Austin, president at Loop9 Marketing, advised, “The talent lies in being able to tell someone (honestly) their work sucks and it serving as inspiration, not condemnation.” The best leaders keep their focus on the organization, rather than making it personal. Mark Trueblood, copywriter at Turkel, says, “Being a leader means serving something greater than yourself. This requires a firm hand and an open heart.”

In a tough economy, pressures run higher, tempers are shorter, budgets are smaller and deadlines more unreasonable. Stress and insecurity run high, and intolerance for jerks runs low. Larry Tolpin, chief creative officer of Y and former chief creative officer at BBDO and JWT Worldwide, adds, “The same goes for hiring people … don’t settle.”

Bob Kuperman, former president-CEO DDB Worldwide, New York, quoted the ultimate source, Bill Bernbach: “We have two requisites for people working at Doyle Dane Bernbach. Number one, they have to be nice people. And number two, they have to have a lot of talent. I’m sorry for the nice guy who doesn’t have talent, but that’s bad for my business. And I don’t give a damn how much talent the son-of-a-bitch has. I don’t want him. Life is too short.”

Next week, we’ll continue on the debate with a closer look at asshole brands, hack brands and the pursuit of the talented sweethearts. In the meantime, if you’re curious to know which triggers you’re using to persuade others, check out the F Score personality test in my book.

One last thing. To everyone who shares his insight and experiences with me online, thank you! You make conversations like this fascinating. If you’d like to share your thoughts on this topic, please do, at facebook.com/hogshead, or at twitter.com/sallyhogshead.

“What? A free copy of RADICAL CAREERING? …seriously??”

by Sally Hogshead on February 5, 2010

RC Free 300x196 What? A free copy of RADICAL CAREERING? ...seriously??

A FREE copy of Radical Careering

Click on image above for FREE download PDF 2.2mb

It’s true: a FREE digital version of my first book, RADICAL CAREERING: 100 Truths to Jumpstart Your Job, Your Career, and Your Life. Inside, you’ll find bite-sized nuggets ideas on creativity and your career, all wrapped in award-winning design.

A few of our favorite from the 100 Radical Truths:

  • Nº 12: Luck is for wimps.
  • Nº 31: You can be comfortable, or outstanding, but not both.
  • Nº 67: Mistakes are tuition.
  • Nº 46: Money follows great work, not the other way around.
  • Nº 100: Make your memoirs worth reading.

The publisher very kindly agreed to let us give you this digital version for a limited time, and it’s the first time this content has been available for free. Tweet, post, and share to your heart’s content.

Happy radical-ing!

How to update the Christmas brand for 2010

January 3, 2010

With the economy affecting ad budgets everywhere, even the most established brands are reinventing themselves. How could Christmas become more relevant for 2010? Pulling a few favorites from the blog, I offer tongue-in-cheek suggestions for updating the season.

Read the full article →

How I became fascinated with fascination

November 30, 2009

Growing up in my family, earning attention wasn’t a recreational pursuit. It was a matter of survival. At the age of 7, I learned why fascination matters.

Read the full article →

ADD-friendly reading: Hog-isms 002

November 9, 2009

Our second issue, for your media-snacking pleasure. Filled with tweets, quips, other tidbits of innovation goodness. Oh, a splash of bacon-infused vodka. – Bon appétit.

Read the full article →

Put down the beer bong, and read this blog post.

March 11, 2009

Welcome to day three of “A dozen things I wish someone had told me.” Today’s topic is, appropriately, about being in school. (Of course, as always, this applies to those of us who graduated long, long ago.)
1) Your taste will change. Several times. Enjoy that evolution and stay open-minded. (And don’t get stuck in a [...]

Read the full article →

Geez, I wish someone had told me this while I was still in school.

March 9, 2009

Hindsight is 20/20, sure. But foresight is even better.

To that end, I’ll be blogging each day this week with one dozen pieces of “foresight” that I wish someone had told me when I was in school. A few of these points reference advertising, but most apply to anyone in business. (Most are probably [...]

Read the full article →

How to Recession-Proof Your Career

September 22, 2008

The worst thing you can do right now is freak out and hide. Here’s how to stop acting scared and start making progress.
Yes, unquestionably, the rules of work have changed. We’re in an angst-ridden environment now. Planned layoffs in July rose 26% compared with June, according to consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. But [...]

Read the full article →

500,000,000 sperm can’t be wrong.

March 18, 2008

Six Tips to Help Develop and Sell Your Best Ideas
At one point in your life, many years ago– approximately nine months before you were born, in fact– you competed in your very first new-business pitch. You were competing against a few hundred million others, but apparently you won, because you’re reading this today.
The principles of [...]

Read the full article →